Krähmer, 12 Ländler

Ernest Krähmer was born near Dresden, educated and began his career in that city, then moved to Vienna, where he was an oboist in the Kärthnertor-Theater and subsequently in the court orchestra. He was also very successful as the primary Csakan virtuoso, an instrument keyed in Ab that became known as the "Romantic recorder" and was very popular during Krähmer's lifetime (he died in 1841) but quickly fell out of favor thereafter. (Information here is translated from the German Wikipedia articles on Krähmer and the Stockflöte. For images of modern reproductions of the instrument, go here: link.)

In my previous post on the Ländler of František Pecháček, I wrote in connection with his 12 Ländler (1801) that they represent the "violinistic Ländler in its traditional form—as distinct from the later keyboard Ländler of Schubert and many other composers in the 1820s, who strive to make the Ländler congenial and specific to the piano, holding to the form and characteristic figures but using less common keys often with chromatic twists and exaggerated registral play, the result being to blur the distinction between music for dance and music for recital."  The Csakan, keyed in Ab, obviously made its own contribution to this shift—indeed, Krähmer and his wife Caroline Schleicher "performed regularly together in Vienna, he on the oboe and the csakan, she on the violin and the clarinet" (translation from the German Wikipedia article on Krähmer).

In the spirit of clarification, however, I remind the reader that the confusion of menuet, Ländler, and Deutscher Tanz [German dance] was at its highest in the first quarter of the 19th century. The dances were still easily distinguishable but the musics for them were not. The music of menuet and German dance had begun to intersect substantively in the 1780s at the latest, as we know from the symphonies and chamber music of Haydn, Mozart, and their contemporaries. In the trios of their menuet movements—especially with Mozart—the distinctive figures of the violinistic Ländler were also sometimes heard, though these can be hard to distinguish from a general pastoral affect. After 1800, things became much worse, a key figure demonstrating that change being Schubert, who is known to have used the label Ländler, Deutscher Tanz, or Walzer in different copies of the same piece. (Publishers were no help in this regard, either.) Walzer was the generic later 18th century term for "turning dances," which included both Ländler and Deutscher Tanz even though their steps, figures, and tempi were quite different. As things stood around 1815, the music of the Ländler was usually quieter and slower than the Deutscher Tanz and preserved more of the traditional figures, where the Deutscher Tanz usually still sounded like the hybrid type of the 1780s. Only in the 1830s, when the tempo of dances generally sped up did the distinction largely disappear and pieces were almost always called Walzer.

All this being said, the first piece in Krähmer's 12 Ländler (published in 1827) is quite obviously a Deutscher Tanz:

(The modern notation is by Hans-Thomas Müller-Schmidt; downloaded from IMSLP.) Note that the first strain is an antecedent + continuation theme, or what I call the "galant" theme because of its overwhelming importance in the second half of the 18th century: every one of the 2-bar ideas is different. The explanation, perhaps, is that this was intended as a promenade, a regular feature of any extended dance set (Beethoven included one to begin the 12 German Dances, WoO8 (1795), for instance).

The second piece in the set is much more like a Ländler, with soft dynamic, predominantly eighth-note rhythms, and characteristic phrase-ending figures. The chromaticism, however, is distinctive (Schubertian?). The theme is a period.

The third number shows a different side of the Ländler: soft dynamic and phrase-ending clichés but consistent quarter-note rhythms. The B-section would also be familiar to Krähmer's listeners as belonging to rural Ländler practices: the Schnadahüpfel (where the often delicate turning figures of the Ländler are briefly interrupted by loud stomping).

On the Schnadahüpfel, see this post on my Schubert blog: link.
Information on the confusion of waltz-family types draws especially on work by Walburga Litschauer. See these posts on my Schubert blog: link; link; link; link.

Pecháček, 12 Ländler (1801)

František Martin Pecháček (1763-1816) was a Bohemian violinist, conductor, and composer who spent his professional career in Vienna as a conductor in the Landstraßer and Kärtnerthor theaters. He was the father of the violin virtuoso Franz Xaver Pecháček.

A prolific composer, Pecháček senior wrote in all contemporary genres, including music for social dance. His 12 Ländler, for an ensemble unusual in the repertoire of the waltz—2 clarinets, 2 horns, and bassoon—were published in 1801.

Like Beethoven's Ländler in WoO11 and WoO15, written at the same time, this set provides an excellent example of the violinistic Ländler in its traditional form—as distinct from the later keyboard Ländler of Schubert and many other composers in the 1820s, who strive to make the Ländler congenial and specific to the piano, holding to the form and characteristic figures but using less common keys often with chromatic twists and exaggerated registral play, the result being to blur the distinction between music for dance and music for recital. A characteristic Pecháček's 12 Ländler do share with later Ländler is their repetitiousness, a marker of their primary role as music for dance, not for performance.

I have reproduced the first clarinet part below, with annotations about themes in the first strains. Of the twelve pieces, the first strains of two are clearly—and two more are probably—presentation + consequent themes, the type with least variation in its units. Five are clearly periods—and two others might be. There is just sufficient difference between basic idea and contrasting idea to identify the opening phrases as antecedents. In the majority of the numbers, the theme's cadential idea is derived from the figure of bars 3-4.

What applies to the first strains also does to the second.

Published parts downloaded from IMSLP.
Wikipedia article on Pecháček: link

Menuet series 2-12 (Gottlieb Muffat)

Another close contemporary of J. S. Bach, Gottlieb Muffat—who was Georg's son—worked throughout the first half of the 18th century in the Viennese court (among his students was the future Empress Maria Theresa). The six suites in the Componimenti musicali (~1739) contain 13 menuets. Here are comments on several of them.

Suite no. 5, the trio to the second menuet, offers a simple presentation phrase, but the continuation emphasizes contrast, not development. So although I have called it a sentence, this first strain really belongs to a separate category, presentation + contrast, a design that is not only common in the menuet, along with the allied antecedent + contrast, but becomes more and more so in the second half of the 18th century, to the point that it is the preferred form for menuets by J. C. Bach and Mozart.

Suite no. 1, trio to the menuet. Similar to the preceding.

Suite no. 5, second menuet. A "classic" antecedent + continuation theme, with considerable fragmentation in bars 5-7.

Suite no. 6, trio to the menuet. The distinctiveness of the chromatic figure, the placement of the mirror at bar 5, and the extent of the mirroring all favor hearing this theme as a period.

Suite no. 2, menuet. A reasonably straightforward period; the transposition of the basic idea in the consequent is substantial but the arpeggio figure with the rhythms maintained makes the relationship clear.

Suite no. 6, menuet. The formal functions as a "galant theme" make sense. This one is interesting because of the mirroring of rhythms -- see the two (a)s and the two (b)s -- and shapes -- the two (a)s. Despite the mirroring, the continuation phrase is contrasting rather than developmental.

Suite no. 2, trio. Once again the continuation is a contrasting phrase. The presentation is extended by simply adding two bars that transpose bars 3-4 down a third.

Suite no. 6, "menuet III." The previous example hints at a figure realized in this one. I have labeled the formal functions as a sentence, but the effect overall is not 4 + 4 but rather 6 + 2: three statements of an idea followed by a formula cadence with a different melodic figure.

Much the same effect occurs in the 8-bar antecedent of the 16-bar period in J. S. Bach's French Suite in D minor, menuet II. Look especially at the alto voice (arrow).

We will see this 6 + 2 arrangement—and even its reverse, 2 + 6!—in menuets by later composers.

William Caplin's form theory and 18th century dance

The scholarly literature making use of William Caplin's form theory is growing, if slowly. Some recent examples include Nathan Martin's "Schumann's Fragment," in Indiana Theory Review 28 (2010); Steven Vande Moortele's "Sentences, Sentence Chains, and Sentence Replication: Intra- and Interthematic Formal Functions in Liszt's Weimar Symphonic Poems," in Intégral 25 (2011); and Matthew Riley's "Haydn's Missing Middles," in Music Analysis 30 (2011).

Almost all of the work, so far as I can tell, has focused on extending the reach of the method deeper into the nineteenth century--even into the early twentieth. This tendency includes a rumored forthcoming book by Caplin himself. My interest, on the other hand, was originally in expanding the available style knowledge for the Vienna School composers by looking at their social dance repertoires. Obviously, their published work on its own is inadequate to describe the actual practice of music played for social dancing, but it is what we have. I worked out pages with analyses of menuets, German dances, and Laendler by Beethoven: WoO7, WoO8, WoO11, WoO14, and WoO15; and contredanses by Mozart and Beethoven (all of these were accessible from a website, but the server has been decommissioned). This work was extended to a few contemporaries, notably Czerny, Hummel, Marschner, and Weber.

The principal results to date are that the historical narrative charting a turn from the period theme to the sentence over the course of the Vienna School heyday, or roughly 1770-1830, is incorrect. The period does become much more prevalent at one historical moment -- about 1770, when the French style of contredanse became popular in Vienna. (This was due to the fact that French contredanse music was heavily oriented to the gavotte, whose dance figures effectively required an antecedent-consequent design in the music.) But even after 1770, the period co-existed with other theme types, including the sentence and the hybrid antecedent-continuation. The latter, in fact, was far more congenial to the menuet than was the period, for the reason that the dance emphasized variety of detail, and a theme with antecedent-continuation offers more variety than any other theme type. Indeed, if the composer chooses, every 2-bar unit of this theme can be different: basic idea followed by a contrasting idea, followed by another idea (or fragmentation of a new model), followed by the generic cadence. (Its antipode is the hybrid presentation-consequent, a type so rare in the Vienna School repertoire that Caplin deletes it. It does, however, have a role to play in the Laendler repertoire, which tends to emphasize sameness within strains but contrast between strains.)

As the preceding suggests, once the influence of the French contredanse was established, I wanted to look into earlier dance repertoires. To date, this work has extended as far back as the English country dances in the Playford collections, which confirm the variety of theme types (sentences are surprisingly common, for example) but also highlight the extent to which French court dance practices tended to reduce the number of available theme types.

In the course of all this work, I have also realized that Caplin's catalogue of theme types does not work as well as one would like for some of the subtler idea and phrase length figures common in the social dance repertoire, and my goal over the next few months is to revise (or expand) his taxonomy to account for these, the goal continuing to be to acquire useful style information.